We turn raw data into powerful, compelling stories at Mars Publications. We are a leading research consultancy firm committed to assisting scholars to manoeuvre through the tough environment of high impact publication. Our group is offering tailored Research Paper writing services, selection of journals, and in depth developmental editing.
Do you think something is missing in your manuscript that could give it a breakthrough? We are the experts in finding the gaps that are critical and overlooked by others. Mars Publications will not only make sure that your work does not enter the fray, but it dominates it, whether you are a PhD graduate or an experienced professor.
Literature review is the basis of any study in the world of academia. It legitimizes your project and puts your work on the map of scholarship in the world. There is, however, a threatening tendency to the quality of contemporary scholarship. Most scholars unwillingly reduce their literature reviews into the intellectual echo chambers.
An echo chamber is when the author uses the same small circle of well-known scholars to cite them. They are the same theories that were made without doubt. This creates the effect of a chain reaction in which new ideas are bowed down by the pressure of the old consensus. Our Research Paper Writing service at Mars Publications is aimed at breaking these loops to ensure that you come up with truly innovative work.
The Academic Echo-Chamber
The majority of researchers begin their review with searching major databases with the help of key-words. There is a natural tendency of the algorithms to make highly-cited papers first priority. As such, the most popular concepts receive the highest visibility. When you read what is popular, your own writing will naturally reflect those that are already in existence.
Such a process produces the Matthew Effect in citation. The well-known get even more popular, whereas the innovative but marginal concepts are underground. You must put a vigorous opposition to this gravity when you write your paper.
The Cost of Playing it Safe
Why are researchers guilty of this trap? Often, it is fear. It is assumed by scholars that in case they differ with a giant in their discipline, the paper will not be accepted by the reviewers. This intimidation results in citation signaling wherein authors provide names of big names only to demonstrate that they have read their homework.
The price, however, is the death of novelty. And when you have a literature review that just verifies what everybody thinks, there is no contribution towards knowledge. The high impact journals hardly post articles which concur with the rest of the world. They want friction. They want debate.
4 Signs Your Literature Review is an Echo Chamber
- Circular Referencing: Your reference to Author A includes Author B, who references Author A. There are no external opinions introduced.
- Dependence on “Seminal” Works: You discuss 80 percent of your review of papers published within the last two decades even though the past three years of discussion have been left out.
- Absence of Dissent: You do not provide any dissenting view or studies whose result are null.
- Geographic Homogeneity: You just refer to authors who belong to a particular region or even a school of thought, and you disregard the perspectives of the whole world.
Breaking the Loop to Active Research Paper Writing
In order to create a good literature review paper, you have to be a detective and not a fan. The following is one way to put new life into your work:
Seek Out the “Anomalies”
Find the outliers of the papers. When five papers indicate that X causes Y, get the paper indicating that X causes Z. Although such a research may be flawed, it offers a counter-point that brings your analysis to deeper levels.
Search Diversely in your Database
Do not use Google Scholar only. Search for grey literature– reports, conference proceedings and white papers – use special repositories. They frequently include the latest conceptual innovations which are yet to be humedged by the peer-review consensus machine.
Summarize, Not only Descriptively
A list of summaries is frequently all an echo chamber. An effective Research Paper Writing technique is the one of “Synthesis.” Rather than say, Smith says this and Jones says that, say, While Smith and Jones seem to agree on X, they are not taking into account the important variable of Y that this research will explain.
Challenge Your Own Bias
Ask yourself: Who is my academic enemy? answer Before you write your draft. Hunt down the scholar whose work goes against yours and challenge him or her. Debunking an anti-argument is a close-up to the most effective methods of demonstrating the usefulness of your study.
How Mars Publications Can Help
Here, we know that the literature review is the most difficult phase of the Research Paper Writing at Mars Publications. Our consultants do not merely verify your references, we do a check-up of your reasoning. We assist you in understanding whether you have reached an echo chamber and recommend various sources of information of high quality to make your vision broader.
Mars Publications make sure your background section is not a list of names but a convincing case as to why what you are now doing is the logical and necessary next step you should take. We assist you in identifying the points of weakness in your field in order to seal them.
Conclusions: The End is Progress, Not Concurrence
Publishing in academia is no choir, it is courtroom. It is not to sing in tune with the past writers. Your job is to present a case. You are able to avoid the echo-chamber, being intellectually mature and committed to the further development of your profession.
Get not lost in the clatter of the commonplace in your research. It is you who should begin a new conversation by your voice.